martes, 22 de enero de 2008

de vuelta a hawaii

in the interest of keeping these entries somewhat chronological, i have to take a step back a bit, before college.

senior yeah, high school:

almost immediately after the last day of classes, i got on a plane and flew to lana'i, hawai'i, the island i grew up on.

rather, i've always said i "grew up" there, but that phrase has always struck me as problematic; for someone like me, in that i've lived in maybe too many places to say which ones have "grown me," and in that i wonder just what exactly "growing up" is (although the latter may be a testimony to my still having a lot of said growing up to do). i've gone through the years and the motions. i've fallen in love, fallen (questionably) out, moved away from loves ones, watch others die, etc. etc. - to me my years have amounted to a view of seemingly limitless confusion, consisting mainly of struggle and only tinged with the enlightened-peace that hollywood and middle-aged rockers sell as possible.

but for conversational purposes, i say i grew up there. at this point in my life i've spent more time on that seven-by-twelve mile island than i have anywhere else, with portland being a close second place.


dancing with fire on the beach - every photographer's fascinated with blurred night shots, and while i didn't think of it explicitly while i shot, what metaphor better capsulates youth in all its unbounded voracity


i never tried to keep in touch with the islanders after we left - maybe a little, as a cute parental formality. leaving i didn't really understand what was going on. i still remember the first moment it really hit me that i was truly leaving


and i mean that in the fullest sense of the word. "to leave" is a verb i would clump with the often-used-but-rarely-comprehending-the-full-connotation vocabulary. i would include "to hope," "to regret," and the word "faith" among them.


the island, and that i might not have ever seen those faces again. that's heavy for me, and to this day the concept intrigues me. it amuses me often that people wax about life in this sense, saying "yeah but you'll meet others," "you can always go back," or other such half-sincere lukewarm encouragement. logically, it's never a given that you'll meet others. and really, you can never go back. on my better days i might see this as a blessing; on my normal ones it is perhaps one of the defining reasons for my neurosis.

with that said, i have always met others, in friendship, romance, mentorship, although not love.

i got a phone call from my old friends there one night. teenage voices that i would not have guessed. immediately after talking i felt a sense of calling. all my movement in the residential sense had been since then forward motion: i had not been back to visit any of the places in which i'd "grown up." i was curious as to this feeling - one i had surely sensed in others; a childhood, in this sense, is a sense of belonging that surpasses what you've made for yourself, thus it ties in to identity, and people who look back fondly or even neutrally i think have an attachment to that. you don't need to learn how to put yourself out there to have a childhood in this sense - it's given to you, it will make you, and you're too young to ask why question letting it be as such.


the beach that i visited daily - voted most beautiful in the world, apparently, for its golden sand serene isolation. i never thought of it as such as a kid, obviously - but upon visiting i realized that the backdrop of these years of mine was significantly different than that of my mainland peers.



in this sense i'd always felt like i'd only caught a glimpse of such things, or that i had separate childhoods scattered throughout the united states. the idea of belonging, not only as mentioned above, but to the subculture of childhood-claiming was almost exhilarating.

so i booked a ticket. i spent a week on my old island, marveling. at the results of the pubescence of figures from my childhood, at the lifestyle which to me had grown a special type of exotic in that it was once so integrated into my heart but now foreign to my body. as a kid i could outswim adults and my skin as dark as the filipino natives. i spoke pigeon like any other local, despite my haole skin. now i spoke west coast slang - "dude," instead of "bra," which i intentionally unlearned in utah through the Mormon Church Center for Linguistic Education through Social Castration. My skin was (actually) white, i wore glasses, and hadn't really touched a true beach for a long time.

most people don't understand that, apart from being an official state, hawai'i might as well be another country. thus i was marked with its culture when i came to the mainland, and marked upon returning as a mainland city-kid. i almost felt guilty, in a way that's been best explained by authors i've read who write about leaving the ghetto to pursue a better life. that's not an understatement - hawai'i has some truly ghetto parts, especially for a white person. appropriately i was shaped by this, again in a way that relates to mainland white-person-in-black-ghetto discourse. i don't go into this with everyone because i'm aware of how controversial and trendy that whole shebang is.

it's not that the words "better life" were inscribed on our departure, but my education was the reason for us leaving. an old teacher, upon seeing me again, told me he'd always thought i would wind up in harvard. really i could go on and on about this, but the point is that: leaving. it was then i realized just how much of a trend it had been in my life. having never looked back before, seeing what exactly i had left was dumbfounding. really it's not that one leaves a place; they leave possibility, potentical, in search of the same, but of a different color. either because of this phenomenon repeated again and again, or simply my brain chemistry, or whatever - i'm today continually perplexed between these two seeds of possibility - to stay or to go. it seems trite but really, there are few greater impacting decisions in your life than where you decide to do such things. i pick up and go in one sense without thinking and and in another because i think too much.

i found connection there again, after all those years - which was amazing and surprising, as i lean towards nurture vs nature. but my mind jumps to the paragraph above - leaving. always leaving. i wonder these days if the amount of goodbyes has affected my development. the sense of developing community fulfills me greatly, and i've been able to do that so far wherever i've lived. i live for this connection, but i can say goodbye like a pro. i'm more emotional on the car ride to the airport than the kiss on the cheek at the curb.



i was obsessed for a while with shots like this: a closeup macro of someone's eye with something in the background. I've always thought, however cliché, that a lot comes through simply from eye contact, whether photographical or interpersonal. i like beth's in that it almost looks sexless, and that her eye looks somewhat aged. i'm fascinated with shots that, at least to me, suggest something about the innerworkings of someone's head, and if not the subject in particular, than something relatable to the human condition. that sounds faux-philosophical, but i mean it. surely we can all relate to the scene of one pensive eye against a terral background.




with beth, above all others, there was a palpable understanding - which is astounding to find after 8 years of not seeing someone, to realize that two completely disparate paths have brought two different individuals to exist on the same life-frequency. while i'm not really a portrait person, i took this randomly, sticking the camera in beth's face obnoxiously, hoping for candid shots. this is the sort of thing that really stimulates memory and nostalgia for me, because no one remembers people as the poses they strike in pictures; beaming smiles with chests triumphant are simply not the reality of our interactions. moments like this, where you see the half-smile, the contemplative eyes, the tousled hair - those are what speak, for me at least.

lunes, 14 de enero de 2008

vuelta 1

i had this idea that there were so many fish in the sea that it would have been inevitable that i would find someone in college romantically. my ambivalence and my view of the world as impossibly big in both people and places preemptively affirmed that it would have been impossible to hold a relationship with jen in college. one, because in principle the idea of love and commitment turned into obligation was/is sickening, two because logically this was, granted, the most serious and beautiful of the relationships i had (have had), but still one of the only. i was planning ahead, in the sense of leaving myself open, a quality that would be key in analyzing me as a person. i do this today, with regards to the things that are most important to me in life, namely music romance and language.

but logic has no place in such matters. i missed her; i also missed the intimacy, which i hadn't found and either way could not look for. i felt a burden of duty on my shoulders to pay respect to the memory of us by abstaining from relations with others. missing a person and missing what you had with that person are a fine line between, but either way that line lead to me booking a ticket back to portland as a surprise. i went with the primary intent of seeing my sister, who was starting to show signs of depression. until then i had considered it my disease, in relation to the family; now i think we all possess some character of it. i felt i had ducked out on loved ones to go to college. this conflict of leaving people, especially family, to go selfishly into my own path is something that has been present since then, and without any real resolution.

i hopped back on the greyhound bus, a route all too familiar for me. i either didn't know what i was doing or i knew all along. the mindset going to the bus station was something i can't really explain - like my brain was on autopilot. the only thing i can compare it to would be my days as a smoker, when i would to the store to buy a pack of cigarettes. i didn't really think about what i was doing, just felt a pull towards the source. like walking in any other direction was just not really what i wanted to be doing then. the mind goes blank, and yes it's possible to ask oneself explicitly the whats and whys, but the whole question in itself seems irrelevant.

looking back it hadn't been that long since i had taken it. i surprised anyel first, then jen, ducking around a college that was not mine but blending in nonetheless. jen and i went on a walk down to the salem version of a riverplace. being with her was surreal, magical. she had this weight upon my eyes, as if all of this world were merely black & whites but those who really matter stuck out in vibrant color. it didn't take long for the tears to come. one fell on the cement dock and i took a picture of it with my cellphone; she called me emo and we half-laughed about the situation.


every time i've had a conversation with the other side of a romantic relationship where they're unhappy in some way, i get a wash of a very cold, resilient, mindless bundles of emotions. i become aloof; i detach from the situation completely, approach it logically, analyzing the other person's statements and answering them vaguely. with jen i would go through this, but only with her would i eventually well up and feel the weight of the situation as the most pressing in the world. i would go from feeling like a ghost watching the other person weep to the transparent image of a person to feeling like the entire universe revolved around that moment. like i was seeing us at once both from the perspective of one of those 360 degree rotating camera shots in romantic movies and as if the scenery and backdrop had all disappeared, where life was now a framed shot in which this person's face was the raison d'etre of the entire piece. this isn't metaphorical speak, i get like this with people who are important with me, and i'm being actually surprisingly literal here. i'm a very visual person.


we walked. she cried and we embraced each other. i have another very crazy character trait where i simply do not cry 99 percent of the time that i find others crying. this was, for a bit, like the 99 percent of other times, and then became an exception. i kissed her. oddly enough i don't remember what i felt when i did. nor what i was thinking. part of me couldn't stand to see her so shaken. i was too, but the that rarely [is or was] something i consider in such situations. i was overtaken by the moment, by the possibility and the ludicrousness of it all. there was a certain self-empowerment by daring to do such a "foolish" thing. ironically this is in relation to something i feel like most people do without thinking. but at the moment of that kiss i do remember a pang of guilt, of what-if, etc. what if i had just signed a contract i couldn't fulfill, etc. {i felt this way when i asked jeanna out the first time. the attraction was at that point not very even at all, and i knew i would hurt her through it. but in the moment i was aroused, in a non-sexual way, by the ability to give someone joy. i sometimes wondered if there was something similar in this situation.} but i left pdx hopeful, intrigued, feeling adventurous in the coronary sense.

when i got back to the twin cities, i embarked on the "long distance relationship" saga. which was way more complicated that i could have ever seen, but i wouldn't regret it, nor would i be the type. the point is these photos were taken from a trip back to portland and walk around downtown with jen. i like the one of her looking across the river, because of the hint of melancholy in her stare. we put each other through some crazy times.

domingo, 13 de enero de 2008

ida y vuelta, part 1/4

i left for school that summer of 05 and jen and i split, as we had planned. it was not pretty, and not something either of us really wanted. from that point marks the beginning of a new struggle, one that's evolved and changed, but still lasts in some sentiments today. i've done a lot of thinking since then-

i pierced my lobes the day i left, and drove out to minnesota with my dad. i'm the ultimate cliché in that driving away from something with a humongous open road is a perfect avenue, no pun intended for headspacin'.

at mac i did this community service program called "lives of commitment," where we got partnered with non-profit orgs throughout the cities. this pre-orientation for the program put a lot of new kids looking for connections into a room together for a week, and so not surprisingly, i made a ton of friends, a solid few of which i still have today. the first few months were everything they should have been in a lot of senses. handshakes, night adventures, the introduction-question canon and the self-explanation high. (most) everyone loves this part of college; i did, for sure. full of mystery and possibility, and really i think that's the driving force between all attraction. a core amount of this first semester was passed with sara and marlene.

marlene from the bronx, sara from the bay area. marlene's unconditional loyalty was just one of the best things one can find in a person during the first few months of college. sara deserves her own chapter, or two, in this blog, perhaps if i can find a photo...

these are perfect examples of that era. marlene's is classic, with her classic smile. shots like this make me remember the good times. sara's is fitting. compositionally it's oddball, but the expression on her face is all hers for those who know it. to me it says intrigue, and there's a hint of a smile. one of my big clichés is giving lights this boomy blurry quality, which very well maybe the NSYNC move of photography, but hell i ain't sellin' these prints, so no biggie.

and so time flew by.

charisma check

charisma check, the band i had in high school. i had high aspirations - although during that time, i was going through a psuedo-philosophical revolution of strictly non-hope. either the difference between the two is a fine line, or it doesn't really exist. i would later learn that "abandoning all hope and fear" is smooth sailing until it comes to relationships, as i learned with jen. there was all sorts of hope there, thus disappointment in the end - but it had to be, because it was love, the truest i've known.

the point is that charisma check manifested a great deal of the direction in which i would take my life, and at the same time the life that i already had. this is high school i'm talking about, which makes me pause and think that i might be slightly ridiculous with all this life-talk, but really i've never taken such things (such things as life and the universe, woe is me, jesus) lightly. i never have. as i've written in my other blog, my first glimpses of memory are from ages, subjectively young years, where my adult models would comment on how serious i seemed, even downright sad, which seems (seemed) inappropriate for such a young age. i do think i lived as careless as i could in my early youth, for i knew nothing different until we moved from hawaii.

the band was what happened when you mixed two indie rockers with a guy who studied jazz bass. we looked for ways to make tunes that rocked hard and also proved we knew a little bit about music (meaning we were all choir kids). jon, the drummer, the oldest one, always full of grotesque humor; in your face always talking about his girlfriend's pussy and full of ways to sardonically shut-you-the-fuck-up. dan, a quiet guy whom i'd always admired from afar, and whom everyone else admire. i always liked him because he didn't ask for the enormous attention and respect he got from everyone, it was just there, almost like a quality of his personality was inextricably linked to the respect of others. i never thought i'd reach a level of friendship with dan, but i thought we were quite close towards the end of high school.

we played gigs; actually a fair amount for a high school band. i got exposure to the indie-youth-punker scene in portland with the meow meow, an industrial hole with a couch, soda bar, and a whole bunch of punkasses sneering and smoking in the makeshift deck upstairs. through the chain-link fence you could see such glamorously low-fi views as....more industrial area, but this was the nesting place for all sorts of kids, and i think i got to see the tail-end of that scene, right before the punk image exploded to completely-fucking-trendy.

either way, i loved it because i did fit in, in a sense - and in another sense i never did. my grades were too good, i was too gentle, too softspoken, rocked too little studs on my hoodie for some of the trendyfucks. at the same time, i've always been able to get along with people from all sorts of crowds, and there were definitely legit people to be found - ironically a lot of them were jon's friends and away from the high-school scene. i think it was about struggle - at home, in the head, or the consequences of teenage apath, who knows. maybe it wasn't the point to know, it was more the point to be pissed off, and i myself was, in my own way, but then i met jen and went blissfully soft and mushy for a while. i look back and think how if i had the struggles i had now back then, i would have been the punkest motherfucker out of all of them.

but you wouldn't tell from this photo. it's so telling, to me at least. in my room, on my futon - we put a blanket i bought in mexico to cover up the lackluster clichés (or cliché lackluster) covering my wall. i like that you can see the "jazz standards real book" by my side. i'm wearing the necklace i got in panama, probably the summer before -


i wish i had digital photos to put up from the panama experience, maybe i'll find some


and my hair is short, also a consequence of the central-american excursion. i'm also wearing a ring, beaten (although you can't tell) from playing a djembe on a choir trip, given from jen, bought at the downtown saturday market. i've always had an appreciation for jewelry and adornment in that sense - the symbolism is almost mystical for me - a piece of a place that you take with you in the physical sense, as if to affirm all that you take in the non-physical. this is the reason for my piercing history and stretched ears, and will likely lead to a handful of tattoos.

(to me) i look clean, from the inside out. confident, and i donno where i got that smile (i mean i do, from my grandfather), it looks like the one that would mark the face of a successful husband or something similar coming home to greet the kids. i've always thought my eyes look melancholy when i smile, for some reason. and if i had to give that a root, i'd say those are my mother's eyes, through and through.

we wanted to pursue charisma check to the point of getting a label. kids with shitty bands around us were getting offers, and our music (and i don't think this is just fond hindsight - please, i'm obviously not the type) was actually pretty cool. it was probably through these rehearsals in our basement, in the industrial district practice spaces littered with PBR cans, that i started thinking about pursuing music as something more than a hobby. i have crystal clear in my head (for now) playing some interlude for a 6/8 ballad of jon's and truly connecting for one of the first times. that's the same high i look for today.

but i left to go to macalester. why? i was high in another sense: the leave-town-adventure type - and blinded by another, which was my ambivalence towards throwing all my chips on music. i also bought in to the liberal arts propaganda a lot. what can i say? it's the bourgeois of today's society. i don't regret it, yet, but the vibe from where the cheap promo shot above came is not to be found at a school like mac. when i left portland, i left the portland vibe, yes, but more importantly i left the vibe of a city, which is very different from the vibe of 1800 vanilla liberal arts kids in a brick enclosure.

sábado, 12 de enero de 2008

taken from on a beach trip, the black and white layers motif that i would eventually overuse with every photo i took, but hey. this was still "young," or somethin. i never wanted to have "best friends," i think probably because of the social implications or the why-not-me syndrome, i don't know. but i did, in a sense, and these were/are some of them for sure. i like it because we all have faces on that i think are(were?) suitable for each of us.

ironic that jen and i are between josh and gina, hah-

anyel


anyel always used to sing this song. that's not the first thing that comes to mind with her though. i took this after school one day; if i remember correctly, i was stressed out, and she offered to read to me - i remember that for me it was a kindness so tender that i was at first a little uncomfortable. it was there in edwards park that i think i started to understand the depth of the friendship i'd have with her, and i'm truly grateful for that. it continues today, although distance complicates things.

what a whacky taste for a photo editing. i still think the swingset looks cool, even if putting the lyrics is kind of cheeseball. if i remember correctly, i was going to give this to her.

non.glam-glam

hangin' with eleysha and dan, i always felt like i got a glimpse of one of the avenues life could have taken were i to have stayed in portland. there is something glamorous about the non-glamour, to me. not to suggest that i'm a glamour-hound or that my life is as such these days, or that i would want it to be. i think i felt like i was almost destined for it, actually - the stay in pdx vibe. really the first time i thought about anything contrary was due to hanging out with a crowd of people obsessed with getting into good schools far away during my sophomore/junior years of high school. that opened up a whole new avenue of thought for me. furthermore it was an adventure i didn't think i could have passed up.

but as i mentioned, i am ambivalent to an insane degree. i can see myself in portland. i can see myself having gotten a job pulling shots, maybe rocking out on the electric bass, smoking weed, and really i don't know that i would suspect anything could be different. on my bad days, this kills me - because in the sense of this urgency how could one ever make an informed decision if ambivalence gifts both sides of the scale with 100 lbs? perhaps it's a blessing, in that you can't ever know if you "got it wrong, " so to speak, although i don't believe in that either.

the pic is super glam, though. moreso than the times, although after turning in for the night i remember having a felt a sense of accomplishment, not specifically with dan and eleysha but with a range of non-glam kids, for having felt integrated, in a sense, to what i believed to be a facet of very "portland" life. i'd like to be able to remember if it felt natural or not, but i don't. guess i should have upped the contrast on some picture of the sidewalk to remember, har har.

downtown

i got to take this one with a nice camera at the beaverton max station. relatively unedited, actually. apart from my fascination with tunnels and trains and this cliché-as-fuck composition of the person waiting for the train, it reminds me of how much i did on the newspaper senior year, and how that truly was a good experience. this is the stuff i need to remember. i know this because the shot's in beaverton and...really why the hell else would i go out to beaverton?
this, the bus mall downtown waiting for the 4 division bus on 5th street, is an image burned into the back of my mind for having spent a lot of rainy nights by the urine-stained grafittied 1980s busstop. i don't think i ever managed to get a good shot inside the bus. taking the bus was a big thing, and i learned the bus system as fast as i could, since coming from hawaii and suburban utah, i had never seen anything like it.


i like the faceless...luke? mark? i can't remember. this image was so shitty that i edited it way too much, and someone probably could have done the same thing out of charcoal with more detail, but i did walk this bridge....a lot.

earlier still



these were some of the first image i took with the camera from which all of these shots came. the style is noticeably inexperienced, i think, but the point isn't really the style, it's the nostalgic oomph that they give me. my sandals, used from jen's aunt, i believe, and those shorts - i must have walked this route from the river a billion times - through the industrial district and right by all these round stoplight buttons from which this shot is taken.





at the time i just thought it was a cool perspective...i won't go so far as to analyze the dude-in-the-metal-ball sorta thing, cause that just might be over the top, completely. but i do wonder, a little bit. what makes our art come out as such? sure these are just pictures taken and edited out of fun, creativity yes, but no delusions of grandieur involved - with that said though, some of the million things we're exposed to and could use as creative cannon fodder end up as influence and inspiration, and the question might be why.

farther back


i found that a lot of the truly older photos from the pdx era are on another computer, but i did find some and will continue to post trying roughly to stick to some timeline.

i took this (i think) before i went to mac. this was before going on a camping trip somewhere up in northern oregon. i feel a little odd posting a picture of jen here, but for the purposes of this blog, i think it's fitting. it would be a lie to say she wasn't a humongous part of that segment of my life, and even afterwards, in the twin cities. hell, even today,

i wonder about the effects of our relationship. this was one of the best things that ever happened to me, and on a good day i can almost smile saying that. the bad ones are another story, and while this may seem pathetic, i truly am proud of this picture, perhaps for only reasons that the people who know her will understand. i think it captures her beauty, god knows there's a lot of it one could capture, but more specifically her eyes and smile are confident, spontaneous, intelligent; the shot is un-posed, as is fitting for her. the truth is the shot came after some tense moments, as are many when your relationship has an expiration date, but this second wasn't, and that's the whole point of photography, in my opinion.

the tenseness described lead to a love for e.e. cummings's poem 16:


in time of daffodils(who know
the goal of living is to grow)
forgetting why,remember how

in time of lilacs who proclaim
the aim of waking is to dream,
remember so(forgetting seem)

in time of roses(who amaze
our now and here with paradise)
forgetting if,remember yes

in time of all sweet things beyond
whatever mind may comprehend,
remember seek(forgetting find)

and in a mystery to be
(when time from time shall set us free)
forgetting me,remember me

because, well, enough said: cummings nailed it first. oddly different romantic pursuits ended up bringing up this same poem. i've always been a little hesitant to incite poetry or songs, especially in the romantic sense, that have been tagged with memory from a previous era. it feels, instinctively, unfair and downright inappropriate. so i didn't know how to react when someone sent this to me in the mail one year at school, or when i found myself referencing its stanzas. i donno, either i'm too cliché for my own good or it's a coincidence, either way it weirded me out.
this was taken walking back from jen's house one night during that time before the first goodbye. deciding to end a relationship in advance is such an odd concept. i wanted to be uninhibited, so to speak, in college, based on philosophies of living-in-the-moment and todo el royo aquel. i thought that was it for us, hence the cummings, hence the rose backlit by a streetlight, the latter of which i've always found somewhat poetic for some reason. the relationship i had with jen was one of the most beautiful things ever, and i still doubt i've met anyone that comes close to the connection we had.* because of this the fall was something that scarred.
and perhaps this is why i started to focus more on my relationship with distance. i'd been no stranger to it, after a childhood of constant packing-and-unpacking.
*of course how does one say something like that? the irony here is that i wonder if the way i've changed because-and-after our split has resulted in a [me] so different that i wonder what type of person would be the type that i'd connect with today. i wonder if that type would be different. the pessimism, i'm afraid, me ha cogido por los huevos, to the point where i wonder if the type of relationship i had could ever be attained again, even with the same person. thus another reason for the look inward, because hell, it's worth a shot to see what i can find. but is it pessimism? i'd like to say not, if not now, then eventually.

comunidad

taken after coming home from college the first time. we did the "usual," hitting up the top ten or whatnot of what-to-do-in-portland mixed with what-we-normally-did, to the tune of a lot of homecomings of that sort. this phenomenon of people turning to silhouettes over time is something that occupies my headspace these days.

and another, but of a completely different friend group. i've always had a lot, and the more i move around the more they grow. i'm thankful for this, and consider myself...i don't know, lucky? in some way, to be able to have friends in the places i frequent. the exception would be utah, i suppose, (minus jake). while they grow, however, it grows harder to maintain connections, which is bewildering to me. not in the sense that i don't understand, simply that the dilemma is massive, and without resolution. looking at the faces i can't distinguish who's who in this version. i have a bigger one, but why i liked this shot (i think reid took it) was because it is the quintessential group-of-friends-around-a-bonfire pic that everyone either has or wants to own. if not everyone, then i surely did. it's proof, is it not, of a point in which you were once loved. maybe the faces don't even matter as much as the suggestion of photo in general. we burned a couch that night. the flames were unbelievable.

empañamiento


this is an image outside of the pdx greyhound station, with which i became well-aquainted during my relationship with jen. this is a perfect example of my goal for this blog, and here's why:

i did this without really thinking. i've always been fascinated with high contrast, but i started to explore photoshop on the newspaper staff in high school and started applying it to all sorts of my own stuff. i wouldn't have thought much about it then, but looking at it now i think it's apt to have the patches of gray over a colorful fall scenario, because this greyhound station represents in many ways the beginning of a tainting of sorts that occurred from the trials and tribulations of a long distance relationship. the whos and the hows are covered in my other blog, again to the point of being pathetic. but that's not the point.

pdx

i should start this with something related to portland, a beautiful city in many regards. i'd consider my childhood split between portland and lana'i, hawai'i, with a handful of other places in between.
portland is home to a lot of beautiful and painful memories. leaving it to go to school has marked the beginning of a new chapter of struggle in my life. it's not that i just "left for school." i've never agreed with that sort of mentality. if i'm going to be someplace for longer than two weeks, i'm going to live there, or try to. thus i've often felt that i've left for good.* why so definite? it's part of my urgency that i'm trying to question and explore these days, and with this blog, because something suggests that such urgency after twenty years of life on this earth is a little inappropriate.
*but i haven't, or at least upon returning i'm greeted with a barrage of familiar so potent it's made me uncomfortable. it's something i've covered in my other blog extensively, to the point of being pathetic really.
i lived hard, in portland. not to say i had a hard life; ('cause really that's the most redundant phrase around, isnt' it?) i mean to say i lived fully. i covered more of those streets with my footprints than some of my peers who have lived their entire lives there. thus the streets are covered for me in nostalgic triggers that, if i concentrate, i can almost see: i can almost see myself on powell 5 years ago, on NW 23rd, on sherman burnside hawthorne glisan you-name-it. the image of myself in various wardrobes, bodies, various hair colors; trading magic cards, smoking weed, dragonboating, running from the cops past curfew, eating sushi with max . i'm not saying this phenomenon is unique. what appears to be, though, is my allergy to the nostalgia. in that sense it's like a powerful drug: it sends my head for a trip, and sometimes, i desire that nausea and overwhelming. it has to due with the triages that accumulated last december 06, between loved ones dying, romantic connections, struggles within the family. it sent me reeling for a long while after that.
ironically, this summer when i returned, i felt, after the initial apprehension, and ease on the streets. that has to due with a lot of things, a summer spent in the twin cities being one of the main ones. but despite my neurosis, i'll always hold a place for pdx and i don't count out the possibility of returning. i'm starting with a history from which i've almost come full circle; which is another confounding part and a reason i'm posting pictures in this blog.

step 1

i'm actually really excited to do this, and i think i'll get started tonight, right after i practice some bass. i will start, with what i can, chronologically based on the oldest photo i have on my computer. the photos that show up here weren't all necessarily created under the goal of groundbreaking artistic expression. but they call my attention and offer a trip back in time for me, and maybe a trip inside of me, for you.